Skip to main content

Table 1 Experimental design matrix for optimization of AVG enriched synbiotic yogurt produced by L. rhamnosus according to CCD

From: Functional improvement of synbiotic yogurt enriched with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus and aloe vera gel using the response surface method

Independent variables

Dependent variables (responses obtained from the experiment)

Physicochemical analysis

Functional analysis

Run

X1: AVG conc. (%)

X2: Storage time (days)

pH

acidity

(% w/w)

WHC

(% w/w)

Syneresis (% w/w)

Protein content (%)

Fat content

(%)

Ash content

(%)

Viscosity (cp)

Lab count (log cfu/g)

Antioxidant activity (%)

1

2.5

14.5

3.8 ± 0

0.83 ± 0

69 ± 0

37 ± 0

3.4 ± 0

3.4 ± 0

0.4 ± 0

335 ± 0.4

7.4 ± 0

62 ± 0

2

0

14.5

4.1 ± 0

0.91 ± 0

60 ± 0

52 ± 0

3.5 ± 0

3.4 ± 0

0.4 ± 0

1639 ± 0.5

6.9 ± 0

51.7 ± 0

3

2.5

14.5

3.9 ± 0

0.9 ± 0

68 ± 0

36 ± 0

3.2 ± 0

3.4 ± 0

0.34 ± 0.4

4191 ± 0.7

7.1 ± 0.4

63 ± 0

4

2.5

14.5

3.7 ± 0

0.73 ± 0

67 ± 0

36 ± 0

3.3 ± 0

3.4 ± 0

0.33 ± 0

3591 ± 0.8

7.6 ± 0.2

63 ± 0

5

2.5

14.5

3.6 ± 0

0.88 ± 0

69 ± 0

39 ± 0

3.24 ± 0

3.4 ± 0

0.4 ± 0

3979 ± 0.6

7.2 ± 0.2

61 ± 0

6

5

14.5

3.6 ± 0

1.1 ± 0

72 ± 0

29 ± 0

3.2 ± 

3.3 ± 0.5

0.4 ± 0

5193 ± 0.2

8.2 ± 0.2

70 ± 0

7

2.5

14.5

4 ± 0

0.83 ± 0

71 ± 0

38 ± 0

3.21 ± 0

3.4 ± 0

0.4 ± 0.3

3667 ± 0.4

7.9 ± 0

59 ± 0

8

0

1

4.4 ± 0

0.56 ± 0

54 ± 0

51 ± 0

3.4 ± 0

3.5 ± 0

0.4 ± 0

1520 ± 0.2

7.5 ± 0

49 ± 0

9

2.5

1

4 ± 0

0.6 ± 0

64

44 ± 0

3.4 ± 0

3.4 ± 0

0.39 ± 0

3025 ± 0

8.1 ± 0

59 ± 0

10

0

28

4 ± 0

1.24 ± 0.1

66 ± 0.1

45 ± 0.1

3.24 ± 0.3

3.41 ± 0.2

0.41 ± 0.2

1121 ± 0

5.31 ± 0.2

55.7 ± 0.3

11

5

1

4.2 ± 0

0.65 ± 0.4

70 ± 0.03

38 ± 0.2

3.36 ± 0.3

3.3 ± 0.2

0.36 ± 0.4

4520 ± 0

8.41 ± 0.3

63.1 ± 0.5

12

2.5

28

3.8 ± 0

0.93 ± 0.1

69 ± 0

34 ± 0

3.2 ± 0.5

3.31 ± 0

0.39 ± 0.3

3635 ± 0.1

6.9 ± 0.1

67 ± 0.3

13

5

28

3.4 ± 0

1.33 ± 0

77 ± 0

30 ± 0

3.11 ± 0

3.16 ± 0

0.41 ± 0

4732 ± 0

7.9 ± 0

72.4 ± 0

Independent variables

 

Functional analysis

Texture analysis

Sensory analysis

Run

Proteolytic activity (%)

inhibition of E.coli (%)

Inhibition of L.monocytogenes (%)

Hardness (N)

Gumminess (N)

Adhesiveness (N)

Cohesiveness (N)

Taste

mouthfeel

appearance

Overall acceptability

1

0.5 ± 0

7.9 ± 0

8.5 ± 0

33 ± 0

1.1 ± 0

22.3 ± 0

0.64 ± 0.3

7.5 ± 0.5

7.5 ± 0.6

7.3 ± 0.02

7.5 ± 0.5

2

0.42 ± 0

5.32 ± 0.4

5.17 ± 0

43.1 ± 0

1.65 ± 0

28.8 ± 0

0.62 ± 0.2

7.3 ± 0.5

7 ± 0.7

7.2 ± 0.7

7.8 ± 0.5

3

0.5 ± 0

7.43 ± 0.6

7.9 ± 0.4

34.3 ± 0

1.14 ± 0

21.3 ± 0

0.63 ± 0.4

7.5 ± 0.5

7.5 ± 0.3

7.3 ± 0.5

7.5 ± 0.4

4

0.5 ± 0

8.5 ± 0.3

6.7 ± 0

35.6 ± 0

1.2 ± 0

21.5 ± 0.3

0.64 ± 0.6

7.5 ± 0.5

7.5 ± 0.6

7.3 ± 0.2

7.5 ± 0.32

5

0.5 ± 0

7.45 ± 0

7.5 ± 0

37 ± 0

1.23 ± 0

20.6 ± 0.6

0.64 ± 0.5

7.5 ± 0.5

7.5 ± 0.6

7.3 ± 0.2

7.5 ± 0.12

6

0.42 ± 0.8

8.43 ± 0.4

7 ± 0

28.3 ± 0

0.63 ± 0.3

19.5 ± 0.5

0.67 ± 0.4

7.2 ± 0.5

7.6 ± 0.5

7.1 ± 0.2

7.2 ± 0.2

7

0.5 ± 

7.4 ± 0

7.6 ± 0

35.7 ± 0

1.25 ± 0

21.7 ± 0.2

0.64 ± 0

7.5 ± 0.5

7.5 ± 0.5

7.3 ± 0.3

7.5 ± 0.4

8

0.4 ± 0.3

4.1 ± 0.3

3.33 ± 0

44.6 ± 0.4

1.47 ± 0.3

30.5 ± 0

0.62 ± 0

8 ± 0.07

8.5 ± 0.5

8 ± 0.3

8.5 ± 0.4

9

0.5 ± 0

6 ± 0

4 ± 0

34 ± 0

0.7 ± 0

22. ± 0

0.6 ± 0

8 ± 0.4

8.1 ± 0.5

7.7 ± 0.6

8 ± 0.5

10

0.44 ± 0

7.34 ± 0.2

6.9 ± 0.1

42.1 ± 0

1.78 ± 0

27.1 ± 0.2

0.64 ± 0.11

7 ± 0.5

6.9 ± 0

6.8 ± 0.3

7.7 ± 0

11

0.51 ± 0

6.4 ± 0.1

6.3 ± 0.2

29.2 ± 0

0.51 ± 0.3

18.9 ± 0.3

0.65 ± 0.32

7.5 ± 0.5

7.8 ± 0.4

7.5 ± 0.4

8 ± 0.31

12

0.51 ± 0

9.2 ± 0.4

9.7 ± 0.3

37 ± 0.2

1.38 ± 0.5

19.2 ± 0.12

0.66 ± 0.62

7 ± 0.4

6.8 ± 0.3

7 ± 0.3

7 ± 0.5

13

0.6 ± 0

13.5 ± 0

12.19 ± 0

29 ± 0

0.74 ± 0

23 ± 0

0.68 ± 0

7.1 ± 0

7.3 ± 0.2

6.9 ± 0.6

7 ± 0.4

  1. Results are means of three independent experiments with three repetitions ± SD (n = 3)