Skip to main content

Table 2 Functional and organoleptic properties of stevia sweetened quinoa-tigernuts breakfast meal

From: Nutritional, physicochemical and quality profiles of organically sweetened gluten-free breakfast meal from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) and tigernuts (Cyperus esculentus L.)

Parameters

Q65_T35

Q60_T40

Q55_T45

Q50_T50

Q45_T55

COM_GDM

Functional Properties

 Emulsion capacity (mL/g)

27.43 ± 2.29c

32.64 ± 2.29c

40.48 ± 2.05b

42.19 ± 1.76ab

46.67 ± 1.32a

25.96 ± 0.98c

 Foaming capacity (%)

7.75 ± 0.12d

8.35 ± 0.25 cd

9.23 ± 0.27bc

9.95 ± 0.17b

11.64 ± 0.61a

4.98 ± 0.05e

 Foaming stability (%)

3.49 ± 0.51a

2.95 ± 0.31a

2.63 ± 0.45ab

1.76 ± 0.20bc

1.27 ± 0.10c

1.24 ± 0.02c

 Oil absorption capacity (%)

176.67 ± 3.06b

172.67 ± 3.06b

164.00 ± 4.00c

163.67 ± 1.53c

158.67 ± 2.52c

188.65 ± 1.65a

 Water absorption capacity (%)

259.67 ± 4.51a

234.67 ± 6.56b

194.33 ± 5.33c

195.67 ± 5.03c

179.33 ± 6.11d

184.65 ± 3.33d

 Bulk density (g/mL)

0.75 ± 0.01c

0.80 ± 0.01b

0.81 ± 0.02b

0.81 ± 0.02b

0.86 ± 0.02a

0.53 ± 0.04d

Sensorial assessments

 Color/Appearance

7.34 ± 0.82a

7.28 ± 0.55a

6.96 ± 1.02a

7.39 ± 0.42a

6.79 ± 0.94a

7.45 ± 0.08a

 Taste

6.82 ± 0.88a

7.44 ± 0.92a

6.58 ± 1.44a

7.23 ± 0.68a

6.48 ± 1.04a

7.38 ± 0.07a

 Texture/mouthfeel

6.94 ± 0.22ab

7.55 ± 0.04a

7.26 ± 0.32a

7.68 ± 0.78a

6.92 ± 0.06b

7.11 ± 0.33a

 Flavor

7.88 ± 0.35a

7.47 ± 0.18b

6.75 ± 0.55c

7.94 ± 0.02a

7.06 ± 0.68bc

7.63 ± 0.08b

 Acceptability

6.81 ± 0.67a

7.39 ± 0.99a

7.05 ± 0.66a

6.84 ± 1.09a

7.11 ± 0.61a

7.52 ± 0.55a

  1. (Q65_T35: 65% quinoa and 35% tigernuts, Q60_T40: 60% quinoa and 40% tigernuts, Q55_T45: 55% quinoa and 45% tigernuts, Q50_T50: 50% quinoa and 50% tigernuts, Q45_T55: 45% quinoa and 55% tigernuts) and commercial breakfast cereal (COM_GDM)
  2. a−eMeans that do not share a letter (superscript) across the row, are significantly different